A Growing ‘Wealth-Poverty Gap’: How Prosperity and Deprivation Now Sit Cheek by Jowl in Across England.
In a postwar estate known as ‘The Nunny’, residents occupy properties just a few metres from their wealthier counterparts in the adjacent Scartho village. One six-foot-tall wall literally separates the two communities in the town of Grimsby, sealing off paths and streets that previously linked them.
“It’s the divide between rich and poor,” said a resident, aged 37. “It has been there since I’ve known. I don’t think they’ll bring it down because I don’t think they’ll want to mix with us.”
An Increasingly Common Pattern Across the Country
Data from government statistics reveals how deep disparity often exists, sometimes over little more than a short distance of tarmac, a hedge row or a wall. Years of budget cuts and lack of funding have led to a situation where a majority of local authorities now have a neighbourhood classified as one of the most deprived in the nation.
This spread of deprivation has coincided with a significant rise in the number of places where disadvantaged and well-off people end up as immediate neighbours. In 2019, only 65 of the most deprived neighbourhoods adjoined one of the least deprived. That figure increased to 119 in the latest data.
A Wall That Does More Than Separate Land
At this Lincolnshire site, the gap is the most pronounced in the country and starkly apparent. The wall transcends being just a metaphorical division; it creates tangible difficulties for daily routines.
- School runs that ought to take a quarter of an hour turn into an sixty-minute journey.
- Access to important services like supermarkets, educational facilities and care homes is made more difficult.
- The site can attract vandalism and loitering, with reports of litter being dumped over the wall and other problems.
“You try to have a nice house and nice garden, and then you live opposite that,” said one resident, motioning at the rusted metal wall.
Local Bonds Against a Backdrop of Hardship
At a local community centre, workers emphasise that support transcends postcodes. “Your postcode doesn’t necessarily indicate your level of challenge,” said chief executive a community leader.
Regardless of ranking in the lowest 10% for multiple deprivation indicators, the estate boasts a fierce loyalty and sense of togetherness among its residents. By contrast, Scartho ranks among the least deprived 10% overall.
A Similar Story: Stanhope in Ashford
This phenomenon is repeated nationally. The Stanhope estate in Ashford, Kent, a 1960s housing development, is in the 10% most deprived of neighbourhoods in England. It is immediately adjacent by large houses built in the early 2000s that are in the top 10% for employment and quality of surroundings.
“They may possess larger properties, but here there’s a stronger community,” said a long-term resident, aged 63. “It’s likely a lot of people in the new builds don’t even speak to each other.”
The economic divide is clear: an average three-bedroom house costs about £275,000 on the Stanhope estate, while across the divide equivalent homes go for about £410,000.
Residents speak of a palpable sense of neglect. “This part of the community gets ignored,” stated resident Susan. “In this area our amenities have slowly been taken away, and most of the issues we face here are to do with poverty.”
The increase in these ‘inequality borders’ presents a portrait of an increasingly segregated England, where prosperity and need are often uncomfortably in close proximity.